web analytics

MOON MEN

Whether they really did go to the Moon or not no one can be sure anymore. But there is one other unique factor to be considered and that is the electro-magnetic field of the three astronauts. It is beyond comprehension how three large men wearing three cumbersome spacesuits could possibly endure a solid week inside a cabin that could barely contain them. Now add to the mix their EMF to see what mental interactions they would bring on them and there’s no way I can possibly imagine them doing it.

NAMEDATE OF BIRTHSIGNSEMFASTRONAUT
NEIL ARMSTRONG5/8/1930LEO/HORSE3+/1-Moonwalker
BUZZ ALDRIN20/1/1930AQUARIUS/SNAKE3+/1-Moonwalker
MICHAEL COLLINS31/10/1930SCORPIO/HORSE2+/2-Pilot

 

It is just not feasible that these three men could endure each others company in such closed cramp conditions for so long by their EMF alone. Three of them means 3 x 4 poles = 12 of which 9+ and 3-. IMPORTANT: See Note below.This means they would be hugely dynamic and whilst it is to be acknowledged this would be a driving force towards their goal, a week in a box would mean chaos.

Click here for a list of the 12 who were said to have walked on the Moon

VERY IMPORTANT NOTE:
As of today, 4 April 2024, I have had to change the dates of birth for Armstrong & Aldrin.  This means I have had to change their EMF interlink!
When I created the list nearly 12 years or more ago, their dates of birth were 20/8/2030 (Armstrong) and (30/1/1930) Aldrin. I happened to see a youtube video of Armstrong claiming he had surreptitiously declared when dying that they didn’t go to the Moon. It made me check the history and, to my shock, I found both his and Aldrin’s dates of birth were declared different than what I had orinally published.
I am extremely doubtful I didn’t make a mistake and, even if I did, would I have made two mistakes? And even then of only those who were supposed to have originally landed on the Moon? Additionally, it is the shifting of the dates that made me suspicious. You see, Armstrong’s original date recorded by me of 20/8/1930 (Leo/Horse) shifted to 5/8/1930 (Leo/Horse) makes no difference to his EMF (3+/1-) but the change seemed to me to be purposely done to undermine what Aldrin’s date change means and reflected in the Scale of Electromagnetic Relationships. Aldrin was originally recorded as 30/1/1930, meaning he was Aquarius/Horse (4+/0-) but this was changed to say he was 20/1/1930 meaning Aquarius/Snake (3+/1-).  This means that Armstrong and Aldrin were originally 3+/1- and 4+/0- (a difficult coupling for the task they were said to have undertaken and achieved as in say a similar EMF par such as JFK 3+/1- and Trump 4+/0-.  Now they are 3+/1- and 3+/1- which is a much more likely a combination. Is this a validation of my system?
Has NASA or the CIA been paying attention to my tables, I wonder?